#Aims and Scopes
#Contents
#Bibliographic reference
#Publisher's data
#Comments
#Search
Universidade do Porto Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto Serviços de Documentação e Informação
#
 #Homepage#Publications#Periodicals / Journals #Linguística : Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto
# #
#Resume
#Retour sur les noms propres standard modifiés
Georges Kleiber
#File (.pdf)    
#Abstract
In this article, we intend to return to the polemic and controversial treatment of the modi?ed proper nouns. In the ?rst part of this article, we expose the main points of the «corrected» version of the analysis of proper nouns presented in Kleiber (1995, 1996), as well as the two main objections made to this analysis by Noailly (2000). In the second and third parts of the present work we examine profoundly each of these objections with a double purpose. First, we aim at proving that they can neither be correctly applied to our proposition nor may be considered a serious obstacle to it. Secondly, we present a general, but precise and unambiguous, overview of the opposition between bare proper nouns, also known as standard proper nouns or non modi?able proper nouns, and modi?ed proper nouns. This overview enables us to reach a theoretical stability and serenity essential to the progression of our knowledge about proper nouns. KEY-WORDS. Proper nouns, modi?ed proper nouns, denomination, categorization, individuals, occurrences.
#Voltar
Last Update: 2013-06-17

DestaForma, Design e Multimédia
Biblioteca Central © 2006 - All the rights - FLUP